I get so tired of this "No Jelly World" nonsense. As for RoseMoon, would it have been so hard to say "You can use the search tool in the yellow bar and see for yourself that it (wink wink) doesn't exist!"? Seriously.Is it against the rules to make a pet page and say it's Jelly World? It has a giant jelly and everything. I know there is no Jelly World. Please clear this up for me!!! ~cena17325
Attempting to make a pet page that tricks people into believing it is an official Neopets.com page and not a user-created page is not allowed, even if it is some place that doesn't exist.
Help! I can never find the "Lab Jellies" game on Neopets and it's one of my fav's. How do I find it? Thanks ~rosemoon209
Lab Jellies? We're afraid you must have just dreamt that game up. You should learn from cenal7325 and come to understand that there simply is no Jelly World, nor odd jelly-related games.
Hmm... why doesn't the petpet lab ray increase level? That'd be cool. (It'd also be cool if petpets helped out more in the battledome, if petpet levels did more, if agility and faerie abilities and all did more.... nevermind.)I was wondering if there's a way to increase the Petpet level, like through training or something like the way you can with Neopets?? Thanks. ~emmatook
Well done on being a caring owner and treating each of your Neopets nicely! ^_^ As far as leveling Petpets, it can be a risky adventure, since the current ways of increasing their levels are by either visiting the Turmaculus or winning 10 rounds in the Petpet Battledome (located on the Darigan Citadel).
...Would you PLEASE be so kind as to explain why I can't use the plural of the word "alien" on my pet page? Remember that Aishas are aliens, too! Did I mention that I love you guys? ~schoolgirl31782
o_O! We tested it out, and indeed an angry brown Meerca informed us that a word as rude as "aliens" was not allowed. We backed away slowly and went to go solve the problem, and after many funny misadventures, we have successfully removed it from the filter. We don't know why it was in there in the first place, so we'll just blame... *flips a coin* Meepits.
This disturbs me greatly. How many pointless words are on that filter, anyway? Does this explain why I can't use "wabe" in any of the spelling games?
I'm also filled with questions as to how the filter works, and if they can see what words aren't allowed without having to test it out manually.
Awwwwww. Vague questions. I know how that is. I just want to hug both of them, and I also am not being sarcastic.We also want to take a not-so-brief moment to mention your AMAZING DEMONSTRATION of question asking! (That wasn't sarcastic.) Far too often we're stuck trying to figure out horribly vague questions. For example, things like this are fairly common: "I was reading this old story about a Neopet, and halfway through the story it cuts off! I think it's a glitch!! Could you fix it?" (Usually with more chat speak, but you get the point.) You told us exactly where to look to find the image you referenced and that makes going through the Editorial questions MUCH easier. Thankyouthankyouthankyou for being specific!
Really? Disabling Javascript gives you an advantage in restocking? I did not know that.I have recently noticed many restockers get iced. When restocking if you have JavaScript disabled is that considered cheating? ~zlqqlz
Yes, disabling JavaScript or images while restocking is considered giving yourself an unfair advantage over other players, and is not allowed. Even though it's a browser function and not a 3rd party cheat, it's still not allowed. Just like opening 100 window tabs and hitting "refresh all" trying to get Random Events will get you frozen faster than you can say, "Geraptiku" (or figure out how to pronounce it; one or the other). Don't get paranoid, though! If you don't know if you disabled JavaScript, you most likely haven't. This question probably doesn't apply to 99.87% of you, so don't fret about it if you have no idea what we're blithering about here.
All in all, a standard-fare editorial. They've gotten a lot less unintentionally humorous since they changed, uh, editors. Ages ago. So I might be the only one still in the habit of reading-to-mock now that it's so much less mockable.
(Most recent editorial is here:
CLICKY!