*higfives back*Archkiel wrote:*high fives Miazilla*
You preach it sister/brother/other!
Good to know ^^ Love the icon by the way. Is that a neopet? I looks a bit like a two eared ghost aisha or somethingArchkiel wrote:((PS, I'm a sister too, sister! ))
No. The <i>first</i> thing we want is for np-making to become more difficult. Games are an awful source of income for the economy as a whole because they make money without putting any money in. This is a direct cause of inflation- and, I would wager, the largest single cause of inflation on the site. Want to argue with that? Try and come up with a single activity on the site which generates that much NP out of nowhere.the last thing we need is to make it harder for people to make NP on the site. The poor get poorer....
I definitely interpreted that editoral as telling us not to use them. I just wish they'd actually disable the damn things.dandelions wrote:It's not that we're not meant to be using them- they're not disabled. We're just not meant to be using them like people were before, to earn 50k a day. And I say that as someone who hasn't used them since they were blocked on petpages...they're not illegal, just inconvenient.
I often wonder how many NP the stock market puts into the economy each day. I'm torn between encouraging other people to use the stock market, too, and the suspicion that if the stock market becomes too popular it will have to be modified to pay out substantially less.No. The <i>first</i> thing we want is for np-making to become more difficult. Games are an awful source of income for the economy as a whole because they make money without putting any money in. This is a direct cause of inflation- and, I would wager, the largest single cause of inflation on the site. Want to argue with that? Try and come up with a single activity on the site which generates that much NP out of nowhere.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests