Silverevilchao wrote:Illuen wrote:Silverevilchao wrote:
Well, that makes logical sense. That's what happens when I post updates at 5 in the morning. xD
Why does Mario get one of the best Final Smashes, anyways? He's already one of the cheapest characters ever. >.>;;
Wait, what? We know of exactly
ONE of the Final Smashes, Mario's. For all we know, his is the worst.
Eh, doubt it. Two fireballs, shooting across the screen and pwning everything? Doubt it. I think Pichu's is going to be the worst - watch, his Final Smash will add 30% to his health or something...
I didn't realize we had confirmation of Pichu in Brawl. I stand by my statement though: we have no idea what the other Final Smash moves do, and I think it is downright ignorant to proclaim one "best", when we only have information on one of them.
Silverevilchao wrote:
Illuen wrote:
As for your second remark, of course you're entitled to your opinion, but I never felt that Mario was half as powerful as some other characters (Link, Falcon?).
Playing against a computer character Mario is more of a pain in the butt than usual (even more so than Captain Falcon). Thus, he is cheap-as-hell.
Though nobody uses him. Samus is almost as cheap 'cause she can snipe from across the field without the benefit of items.
Of course, this is totally dependent on the person involved, and who they have difficulties beating, but I never found any of Mario's moves to be "cheap-as-hell". If you don't mind me asking, what part of facing a NPC Mario is it that gives you such difficulties?
Silverevilchao wrote:
Illuen wrote:
You've mentioned earlier that:
And, of course, since Mario to Nintendo is OMGTEHAWESOMENESS, he is the first to get a Final Smash entry.
Which is a bit of a 'duh' to me. Mario = Nintendo's flagship character, their mascot. Of course they're going to pimp the hell out of him.
Uh, yeah...
Uh, yeah =D. Mario
IS Nintendo, in some ways. You think Nintendo, you think Mario. it makes absolutely perfect sense to me that they dote on Mario, compared to others. It would make absolutely no sense, for example, for Nintendo to get their panties in a twist and psych up Sonic for example, as he was, for the longest time, the mascot for the "enemy" company. Hell, even promoting someone like Star Fox, who is a Nintendo exclusive seems like an odd move, when they could say "Mario is our flagship series, we're going to be more liberal with information about him, as it is obvious that we will not exclude him from this game".
Silverevilchao wrote:
Illuen wrote:I'm sorry, I just don't get the intense bitterness for Mario.
Bitterness? Nah. Just a little bit of jealousy, that's all. He has evil throw attacks, that uber-nice tornado attack, and a weapon that can turn opponents around. His fireballs suck, though.
This, of course, is totally subjective, and I can only comment on my views in the matter. I don't think that Mario is half as "hard" so to speak as a well AI'd Link, or Samus, or Pikachu, or any other character. I think they achieved a good balance in his moves, as they did with all characters.
I guess I'm just not seeing where you're coming from, with Mario being so strong.