Keshi wrote:I don't see how I was talking to you guys like you were ignorant children?
Upthread, Keshi wrote:Do any of you guys know about perspective?
This sounds sarcastic and condescending. Maybe you didn't intend it that way -- for all I know it may have been a straight question -- but if so you should be careful, because sarcastic and condescending is how this sort of question will be interpreted.
Keshi wrote:Who is we by the way? Not everyone who is giving these crits has been creating art and critiquing it for years.
This is the forum of a website specifically for discussion and critique of pet site art. We have the disproportionate number one would expect of artists and other people with trained eyes. You addressed us as a whole and Huggles responded for us as a whole. Also, most of the people who posted above you are long-term regulars who have, by inference, been critiquing art for at least as long as they have frequented Neocolours.
Anyway, the art. I lurve the Ghostly. I have no desire to own any Ghostly, but they do get awesome redraws. I even like that weird face it's making, which strikes me as the sort of face a Ghostly would make under the circumstances.
I'm having the same problem with the Legeica and Tigrean, and it is the problem a lot of other people are having: elements of them are gorgeous; taken as a whole, neither of them quite works as a piece of art. My eye has no idea where to go on the Legeica, and anatomically the Tigrean bugs me. The Legeica does address one of the issues I have with the standard Legeica (which I love): its scales have dimension. The standard one's appear to lay perfectly flat against its profile.
A very pretty batch, though. I hope the rest of this month's Galactic pets are as good.