I think 1-10 would have been a better scale, but I'm not too bothered, it's just fun rating pets. I suppose I just have troubles rating something quite average a 3 because I would rarely give a pet a five. I'll get over it.
1-5 is a lot easier to store. This is already taxing the db in places, so keeping the numbers smaller helps to make things easier, and only having five radio buttons per page means a smaller HTML page than if there are ten.
Oh can the results pages be much like they were before? I think they went:
Top 10 Pets/Top 10 Worst Pets/ Top 10 Colours/Top 10 Worst Colours/Top 10 Species/Top 10 Worst Species
Then they also had your personal versions of those categories above. Yet again the statistical side of me would like to see those.
Yes, already planned. Not personal statistics, though, because those aren't stored. I will be adding how many pets you've voted on, though.
Also when species/colours get revamped are you able to put them up for re-polling? I suppose that would take a while to do, but right now the Feli and Velosotor might score quite low with me, but when they are revamped I'll want to change my votes.
Depends. I did plan to do this, but I'd forgotten one aspect of how I'm collecting the votes, which makes it an awful lot harder.
Will this ever close? Part of what I liked with the Neopets version was that each time a new pet was released I could go and rate it. I believe this will probably take too much of a big thing to update, especially as someone who doesn't play Subeta.
It's fully automated. As long as people keep adding the new subeta pets to the db, they get added into the rating system.
Oh final question, are the Experiments in this rating thing? I can probably find that out myself soon actually.
No, mainly because they don't have a proper colour and species.
Yep, I know
That's something I'll fix eventually, but not yet, in case I add anything to the header.
*does lots of voting*
